
Your Attorney
Gerald D. Lane, Jr., Esq.
Financial Rights Attorney
Gerald leads Clear Lane Counsel, P.A., a firm built to hold companies accountable when they break the rules, and to give clients clear advice and a clear lane forward.
Request a Free ConsultationBackground
Experience on the consumer’s side
Since he began practicing, Gerald has filed and resolved thousands of consumer matters.
He has argued and briefed motions in federal and state court, including motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, and discovery and other procedural motions.
In law school, Gerald spent a summer interning at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Notable Results · Gerald D. Lane, Jr., Esq.
Motions Gerald has won for consumers
Results obtained by Gerald D. Lane, Jr. as counsel for the consumer.
Text messages count as calls
Arguello v. R.E.S.A., Inc. · N.D. Cal. 2026
In a quiet-hours case over marketing texts sent before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m., the court denied the company’s motion to dismiss after oral argument and held that text messages qualify as “telephone calls” under federal telemarketing law.
View the orderDo-not-call claim moves forward
Lewis v. Tenth Hall, Inc. · E.D. Cal. 2026
The court denied the company’s motion to dismiss a consumer’s do-not-call class action, rejecting the argument that federal telemarketing law does not apply to text messages.
View the orderCompany can’t force the case into arbitration
Ellis v. Wallet Buddha LLC · C.D. Cal. 2025
After a consumer replied “Stop” and kept receiving marketing texts, the company tried to compel arbitration or dismiss the case. After a hearing, the court denied the motion, finding the consumer had standing and the company had not proven any arbitration agreement.
View the orderArgued and won from the bench
Fletcher v. Telli Health LLC · C.D. Cal. 2026
Gerald argued against the company’s motion to dismiss and request to stay the case. After oral argument, the court denied both on the record and set the case on a schedule.
Ruled on the record at the hearing; no written order issued.
Two wins in the same case
Bathersfield v. Heart & Soil Supplements, LLC · S.D. Cal. 2026
In a quiet-hours case over late-night and early-morning marketing texts, the court issued two decisions in the consumer’s favor. It denied the company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and its request for an early ruling denying class certification. It also granted Gerald’s motion to strike and dismiss the company’s counterclaims against the consumer, including its claim seeking damages for filing the class action.
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different and depends on its own facts and law.
Federal Court Admissions
Admitted to practice in
Florida
- Southern District of Florida
- Middle District of Florida
- Northern District of Florida
California
- Eastern District of California
- Central District of California
- Southern District of California
- Northern District of California
Illinois
- Northern District of Illinois
United States District Courts
Have a problem with a company?
Tell us what happened. Your first consultation is free.
Request a Free ConsultationOr call (754) 444-7539
